Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

Invelos Forums->Posts by ObiKen Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next
Message Details
Its all about context, was it contiguous or was it clearly separate from the title.

It reminds me of the discussion on "3D" on the front cover, when Ken Cole confirmed its correct usage in the cover title. For me, the edition needs to be clearly segregated from the title.

That's why I voted YES to title.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 19, Topic Views: 8676
Both volumes (191329-204207 and 191329-231616) were digibook (with slip cover) box sets with the same cover title.

The cover title entered in both box parent profiles was "Universal Classic Monsters: Icons of Horror Collection", there was no edition name.

Since the parent and child discs use the same slip covers, how can the child disc have an edition name when the parent doesn't have an edition name? The assumption the second volume disc profiles were correctly configured is questionable.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 6, Topic Views: 3459
I just hope the screener is not confusing media types to include bonus material disc media. We shall see.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 2531
Whilst you are correct, you need to change the existing profile from a 4K/Blu-ray combo set configuration to a 4K only configuration.

I would suggest writing your amendment as follows:

Current profile was incorrectly configured as a 4K/Blu-ray combo set, the back cover clearly specified a single 4K feature disc with a Blu-ray bonus material disc .

• disabled Blu-ray media check box
• removed Blu-ray (Main Feature) disc info
• features as found on 4K disc and Blu-ray bonus material disc, as per normal 2-disc profile configuration.

Hope that helps.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 2531
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
I believe "Loew's Incorporated" was the correct name. It was formed by Marcus Loew in 1924. Incorporated was not a suffix here, it was part of the name as denoted by the possessive apostrophe.

Correction: "Loew's Incorporated" was formed by Marcus Loew in 1919.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 4147
I believe "Loew's Incorporated" was the correct name. It was formed by Marcus Loew in 1924. Incorporated was not a suffix here, it was part of the name as denoted by the possessive apostrophe.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 4147
Invelos Forums->Posts by ObiKen Page: 1 2 3  Previous   Next