| Message |
Details |
| I admit defeat. I have withdrawn those contributions. | Posted: Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 10819 |
 |
| We don't include additional for anything else, so why should we include Additional Visual Effects? | Posted: Topic Replies: 5, Topic Views: 7591 |
|
Quoting Nexus the Sixth:
Quote:
I see no problem entering it as it is. No need to consult other sources when its plainly written on the cover.
Yes, it is plainly written, but does that make it Rating Details? If it is not in this format, do we take other descriptions that is plainly written on the back cover as Rating Details? Where do we draw the line?
Does this "reflect BBFC rating info given at the time of release"? How do we know? This is obviously something that is written by a third party, probably someone at the media company. Is this really what Ken intended by Rating Details? Shouldn't Rating Details be defined by someone who has intimate knowledge of BBFC:s decision making, i.e. someone at BBFC? | Posted: Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 10819 |
|
| Needless to say, if the majority thinks that I'm in the wrong, then I will withdraw my contributions. | Posted: Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 10819 |
|
| Please see my new poll. | Posted: Topic Replies: 12, Topic Views: 13110 |
|
I seem to have stepped into a hornets nest here. It regards entries like this:
My view is that Rating Details should be the details supplied by the rating agency (in this case BBFC) together with the rating. So I have replaced texts like this with the actual wording on the BBFC website, if available.
The data in the illustration is said by some to "reflect BBFC rating info given at the time of release". But that's subjective. The fact is that it is not data supplied by BBFC. If it is not supplied by BBFC, then it is simply a product description, not a rating detail. That's how I feel.
What say you? | Posted: Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 10819 |
|
I don't know if this is something that anybody is interested in, but anyway ...
When I looked into adding a new command type into DvdpScheduler I realized that the code was really badly structured, so I decided to rewrite it from scratch. At the same time I added some improvements, the most significant of which is that all tasks are now run on background threads so that the program does not become unresponsive while a task is run.
I also decided to make the user interface a lot more compact, and not open additional windows when adding events and tasks. I decided to only use HTTPJolie for integration with DVD Profiler, since sending keystrokes between applications is a lot less stable. So you do need HTTPJolie for this one.
DvdpScheduler 3.0
PS DvdpScheduler 2.7 is still available for those who prefer that one. | Posted: Topic Replies: 50, Topic Views: 36122 |
|
| The rules say "enter rating details". These are not rating details. They are rating definitions. So, as I see it, they are not allowed by the rules. | Posted: Topic Replies: 12, Topic Views: 13110 |
|
I see this type of text entered as Rating Details in many British releases:
But isn't that just the definition of PG in Britain? Rating Details are supposed to be specific details for the title in question, not just a generic definition, right?
So, should this type of text be accepted as Rating Details? | Posted: Topic Replies: 12, Topic Views: 13110 |
|
Quoting jschumann:
Quote:
Which My Movies are we talking about? The My Movies by Blue ray or Mu Movies 4 by Binnerup?
The latter. | Posted: Topic Replies: 92, Topic Views: 30069 |
|
Quoting PWolverine:
Quote:
Personally i'm sticking with DVDProfiler as long as I can, nothing so far comes close to it.
That's how I feel as well. And if I eventually have to migrate to another app, it will probably be My Movies. But hopefully that decision is far in the future ... | Posted: Topic Replies: 92, Topic Views: 30069 |
|